Why inspection teams
look beyond Fieldwire
Many project teams use Fieldwire to track tasks and field issues.
Inspection teams often need more than task status. They need to verify work against approved drawings, capture evidence in context, and maintain records that stand up to audit and review.
TruScope is designed for inspection teams who need traceability, documentation, and confidence in inspection outcomes.
Core inspection capabilities in TruScope
*These features support inspection workflows where accuracy and documentation matter.
TruScope vs Fieldwire
at a workflow level
Fieldwire centers on task tracking and issue management in the field. TruScope centers
on inspection verification and maintaining a clear inspection record tied to approved drawings.
| Fieldwire |  |
|
|---|---|---|
| Primary use | Tasks and punch lists |  Inspection and verification |
| Field activity | Issues and task completion | Inspection evidence capture |
| Drawing reference | Supporting context | Primary inspection reference |
| Inspection records | Task-based | Drawing- and revision-based |
| Audit preparation | Manual review | Records captured as work happens |
| Intended users | Field coordination teams | Inspectors, IORs, QA/QC teams |
← Scroll / Swipe →
How TruScope fits
alongside Fieldwire
TruScope is designed to fit into inspection workflows without disrupting existing coordination tools.
Before the inspection
Approved drawings are uploaded, slip-sheeted, and assigned QR codes.
During the inspection
Inspectors open drawings on mobile, capture photos and notes directly on the plan, and move through the site without separate documentation.
After the inspection
Inspection records are already complete. Office, QA/QC, and compliance teams review evidence in context without reconstructing inspection history.
